Document 23: Elayne DeLott, "Weekly Report," Jackson, Mississippi, 11-18 October 1964, Elaine DeLott Baker Papers, Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute, Harvard University. 2 pp.

Introduction

   When I returned to Mississippi, I joined the federal programs effort. The interpersonal dynamics of the Jackson SNCC-COFO office were difficult for me. Battle-fatigued field staff members who had weathered the violence and chaos of the summer did not exactly welcome newcomers. The failure of the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party to be seated at the August Democratic convention sent staff and local people reeling from the sense of betrayal at the hands of the Democratic Party and the liberal establishment. The crisis in direction, resources and interpersonal communication took a toll on morale. Once the vibrant command center of Freedom Summer, the Jackson office was now weary and conflicted. I turned inward, while continuing to seek a place where my efforts could be useful.

   My first assignment was to preview the Poverty Bill and evaluate the feasibility of submitting an application to the federal government from Madison County. One of the hallmarks of federal programs was to offer a pragmatic benefit to the community, while providing an opportunity for organizing. Meanwhile SNCC sought to continue efforts to strengthen the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP) as the legitimate Mississippi Democratic Party, both symbolically as well as pragmatically. In addition to working with local people to help them gain access to the services they were systematically being denied, I proposed a strategy to use these discriminatory experiences with federal social welfare programs (Aid to the Blind, Veterans benefits, Old Age Pensions, and Aid to Families with Dependent Children, etc.) as an organizing vehicle for the MFDP. This first assignment had a significant impact on my subsequent work in the state.

[p. 1]

Weekly Report- October 11-18, 1964

    In the beginning of week I reviewed the Poverty Bill and MDTA

    for possible programs for local communities like Canton to sponsor. After a review of these types of programs it is my personal feeling that little can be done directly through the community and the federal agencies sponsoring these programs. All of them except for the possibility of rural libraries and other small ones not involving major economic development are set up to go through the local administration of the unemployment agencies. I am writing letters now to the central agencies asking their advice on how to now move directly through the community, and for statistical information about area redevelopment, but I honestly feel that what has to be done is to put heavy pressure on the local office so that they are ready to, if not initiate such action, at least be receptive to having such programs set up. As to the mechanics of the program, I do not think it is feasible for any of us to work out an entire program to submit to the authorities, mostly because we do not have qualified people to do this. Our job is to put pressure on local agencies to cooperate with federal men, and federal men to come down and help us plan this competently (This is all in regard to economic development, involving cooperation from industry, banking, and the agencies).

    As to how to apply this pressure, I have a few ideas. One is to organize a large scale welfare type organization staffed by local people, and administered through the political organization of the fdp. using the blocks as units, I would like to train a staff of about 10 people in the basics of the social security act, disability provisions, and unemployment laws, plus welfare programs like aid to dependent children and old age assistance. They could go around to all the families in the negro community and not only get basic statistical information about the economic structure of the community, but also advise the people what program they were eligible for, and help them apply and appeal denials. If we do not win our just appeals, we have a legal leverage in washington, etc, and at the least, one more clear cut case to work with through the courts and government. but aside from the legal aspects, and the increased advantages to the families who do gain more aid, i think a flooding of local aid offices with negro applications would scare these people considerably with the prospect of having to support the negro community financially, and get them to be more willing to cooperate with prograss designed to make the people more self sufficient. It would be a comparitively easy thing to see that there is not too much discrimination in the administration of this program once it was set up through the proper channels.

[p. 2]

    The second advantage to this program is to continue to utilize the political apparatus of the fdp in order to strengthen it as a functioning thing, and to attract more people to it. programs like this proposed welfare one should not be done in the name of the fdp, but by its members. in this way the community would associate the work with the fdp, but legally and in the eyes of the federal agencies it could not be termed a political manuever.

    At the moment I am getting in affadavits on violations of voting rights in American Tent, and discrimination in the administation of welfare. Actually, all this activity has been suspended and will be suspended until after nov. 3, in favor of building up the fdp in canton. I don't think I have to go into what that means in actual daily activities. I feel this is not in conflict with federal programs because the future work I plan to do with federal programs will be done with this organization we are building now.

Elayne DeLott

Previous
Document
Document
List
Next
Document

| Documents Projects and Archives | Teacher's Corner | Scholar's Edition | Full-Text Sources | About Us | Contact Us |