|
Introduction
"Moral reform" was a campaign
in the 1830s and '40s to abolish licentiousness, prostitution, and the
sexual double standard, and to promote sexual abstinence among the young
as they entered the marriage market. Like abolitionism and the temperance
movement in these years, moral reform attracted the support of thousands
of men and women from New England to the Old Northwest. What distinguished
moral reform from other movements was not only its focus on sexuality,
but the extent to which women ran the movement. Female numerical predominance
was nothing new in churches, revivals, and benevolent associations during
the antebellum period, but moral reform was the first reform movement
to become almost exclusively the cause of women.
Objectives
To explore key arguments
in moral reform discourse; to compare and contrast the viewpoints of
different authors on these key arguments.
Lesson Ideas
Ask students to read "Essay
Read at a monthly prayer meeting of an auxiliary Female Moral Reform
Society" (1839). What did this author argue was the purpose
of moral reform? How was moral reform a personal challenge? How did
the author argue for the distinctly female mission of moral reform?
Next have students read the Annual
Report of the Auxiliary in Mt. Morris (1839). What objection
did the author encounter when trying to enlist people to the cause of
moral reform? How did the author argue that this objection was not a
valid one?
To explore another argument, have students read "First
Annual Report of the A.F.M.R. Society" (1840). What did this
writer suggest to reform the morals of society? How was this argument
key to the cause of moral reform?
Next read the "Editorial"
(1838). How did this author argue for the importance of having a separate
Female Moral Reform Society? How did she rebut the male critic of the
Advocate ?
To explore the last major tenet of moral reform discourse, read "What
is it, to 'Cease from Man?'" (1841). How was religion used
in this document to justify the cause of moral reform? Moral reformers
had come under some attack by the clergy. What was this author's solution?
How might this argument have been liberating for moral reformers?
Two options for short writing assignments:
Compare "First
Annual Report of the A.F.M.R. Society" with "Just
Treatment of Licentious Men. Addressed to Christian Mothers, Wives,
Sisters and Daughters" (1838). Ask students to compare and
contrast the authors' views of the sexual double standard and the
proper relationship between the sexes in a three-page paper.
Compare the "Editorial"
with "Thoughts
on Miss S.M. Grimke's 'Duties of Woman'" (1838). Ask students
to address the following questions in a three-page paper: How did
the authors of these two pieces differ on the rightful place of women?
How were their viewpoints similar?
|